Peter Barnes
James K. Boyce
By Peter Barnes
By Steve Stoft and Dan Kirshner
By Peter Dorman
by Mike Tidwell, director of the Chesapeake Climate Action Network
By James Boyce
By George Lakoff
By James Hansen
By Stephen DeCanio
By James Hansen, NASA
By Robert Reich, The Wall Street Journal
By John Tierney, The New York Times
By Robert Reich, Marketplace
By Lee Wasserman, Rockefeller Family Fund
By Bill Tieleman
By Jonathan Alter, Newsweek
By John Bailey, Institute for Local Self-Reliance
By Marc Gunther, Fortune
By KC Golden, Seattle Tiimes
By David Roberts, Grist.org
By John Carey, BusinessWeek
By Alan Durning, Sightline
By Stacy Feldman, SolveClimate.com
By Gar Lipow, Grist.org
By Marcellus Andrews, Barnard College
© 2010. All rights reserved.
Breaking the Gordian Knot on Climate Legislation
Peter Barnes
, Grist.orgWhy Cantwell-Collins Is Best — And How It Just Might Win
Peter Barnes
, GristBoyce: How CLEAR Would Boost International Climate Goals
James K. Boyce
, Foreign Policy in FocusMake carbon cap simple and unsinkable
By Peter Barnes
Dividends or tax shift: which is better?
By Steve Stoft and Dan Kirshner
Why China should cap carbon upstream
By Peter Dorman
How Obama can revive the economy and heal the planet
By Peter Barnes
Beware utilities seeking free pollution permits
By Peter Barnes
Family Income and Climate Security: We Can Have Both
by Mike Tidwell, director of the Chesapeake Climate Action Network
, Huffington PostCap and no trade
By James Boyce
Testimony to the House Ways and Means Committee
By Peter Barnes
The people, not the government, own the air
By George Lakoff
Global warming 20 years later
By James Hansen
Why not a revenue-neutral cap?
By Peter Barnes
Cap or tax: either way, pay dividends
By Stephen DeCanio
100% dividends or fight! No alligator shoes!
By James Hansen, NASA
How about a cap-and-trade dividend?
By Robert Reich, The Wall Street Journal
British Columbians don't trust their carbon tax
By Peter Barnes
Lieberman-Warner amended but still flawed
By Peter Barnes
A new climate deal?
By John Tierney, The New York Times
Polluters should pay us to use our atmosphere
By Robert Reich, Marketplace
Social Security now sending money via debit card
By Peter Barnes
What the melting arctic really means
By Peter Barnes
Fixing climate change without soaking the middle class
By Peter Barnes
McCain's gas-tax holiday plan is at odds with his new climate strategy
By Lee Wasserman, Rockefeller Family Fund
No love for tax
By Bill Tieleman
The most politically practical way to slash greenhouse emissions
By Jonathan Alter, Newsweek
Why not spend the carbon auction revenue rather than give it back?
By John Bailey, Institute for Local Self-Reliance
Since we all own the atmosphere in common, companies that pay for the right to emit should pay everyone.
By Marc Gunther, Fortune
National climate policy needs to be a full-throated roar of solutions, not a soft whimper of palliatives
By KC Golden, Seattle Tiimes
Under any system that puts a price on carbon, energy bills are going to go up.
By David Roberts, Grist.org
It's our atmosphere, right?
By Robert Reich, Marketplace
Climate dividends create a powerful incentive to be even more energy efficient.
By John Carey, BusinessWeek
Cap & dividend can offset some of the unfairness of climate change itself.
By Alan Durning, Sightline
We all own the sky equally, and therefore ought to be equal beneficiaries of any system designed to protect it.
By Stacy Feldman, SolveClimate.com
With either a tax or cap, the price charged for carbon will be passed down the supply chain to consumers.
By Gar Lipow, Grist.org
Cap & dividend takes full advantage of markets while increasing the wealth of ordinary Americans.
By Marcellus Andrews, Barnard College
One last chance to save the planet
By Peter Barnes
The zero carb greenhouse diet
By Peter Barnes
America’s climate solution must be effective and fair
By Peter Barnes
Who will pay for climate stability?
By Peter Barnes
The right way to cap carbon
By Peter Barnes
The politics of climate change
By Peter Barnes